that I really can't justify my argument against Andrew Garfield's character deviating from the 616 Peter Parker. The reality is that they changed Tom Holland's Peter Parker significantly enough that it deviates from the 616 Peter Parker (in the way that Tobey McGuire's more faithful an adaptation).
I don't care that she's specifically black but they really changed MJ's story and personality that they might as well have changed her name and made her a different character. He's a genius and he make his own stuff.He falls in love with Mary-Jane Watson, this feisty Red-head.Like he had been bit by a radio active dung beetle. Andrew Garfield is clarifying a comment he made about being a gay man right now, just without the physical act after it sparked backlash with the LGBTQ community. It's as iconic changing the fact that he got bit by a spider to give him powers. Because again, it messes with the idea of Peter Parker's story. With sacrificing his love and personal life for her safety etc.ĭid it bother you that MJ is an edgy black girl named Michelle Jones now? It's why he struggles with his relationship with MJ. Her death at the hands of the Green Goblin is one of those moments that forms Peter Parker's identity like the death of Uncle Ben. Gwen Stacey was supposed to be that iconic girlfriend that MJ becomes. So, the story that they told with Gwen Stacey is actually a really pivotal moment in Spider-Man lore. I appreciate his good intentions but I think he's wrong in this particular instance. I just think Andrew Garfield is wrong in this particular case. Peter Parker and Mary-Jane Watson is one of them. There's just certain straight characters in the comic book universe where their relationships are iconic.
Most of his relationships with women have been short-term failures so it fits the narrative that he would be gay. More over, I don't have a problem with retconning some character's sexuality like Bobby Drake because largely he's never had a long term relaitonship. It's not Clarke Kent/Original Superman that's bisexual. Jon Kent's bisexuality is a perfect example of this. We've had a lot of great characters come from this. I really have no problem with diversifying comics. Spider-Woman, Spider-Ghost, Miles Morales etc. I'm 100% okay with other incarnation of Spider-Man to be of a different sexual orientation and gender identity. I'm specifically talking about the character of Peter Parker. I literally said "Peter Parker's Spider-Man" specifically because it's a specific character with a specific story that's well defined. "I am a gay man right now, pretty much, just without the physical act - that's all.I'm not making that argument. This is my life outside of this play," he continued. "Every Sunday, I would have eight friends over, and we would just watch Ru, that's literally it. Garfield also mentioned that he has been dedicating a lot of time to watching "every season of RuPaul's Drag Race."
#Andrew garfield gay rights how to#
In detailing the ways in which he prepared for the role, Garfield said that he watched "lots of films," - such as the 2011 documentary We Were Here and the 2012 documentary How to Survive a Plague - that he had done "lots of reading," and that he put up "Peter Staley wallpaper on my walls in my dressing room," referring to the iconic AIDS activist and groundbreaking LGBT rights advocate. Me doing is as much devoted to my friends in the gay community as it is to those that I don't know and those that passed during the AIDS epidemic," Garfield added. "The preparation had begun with all of my friends. "So for me it was doing honor, doing justice and knowing my herstory, as it were." "I had to trust that it was the right thing, and Tony had asked me and I thought, 'Well, if you're asking me then maybe it's OK,'" he explained.